Skip to content
TL;DR of Convo
The five-meeting gate: Live Assistant, the real-time coaching that everybody signs up for, doesn’t switch on until Convo has processed five meetings.
What I tested: Professional, $69.99 a month as of July 2026, across live calls and recorded sales training footage.
What works: the post-call feedback. It quotes you back with timestamps, splits what landed from what didn’t, and gives you a rework for each line.
What doesn’t: timing. Suggestions arrived minutes after the question they were answering, and cold calls don’t wait.
The half-heard call: Convo ran a 21-minute two-person call without the system audio permission it needed, captured only my side, flagged my longest monologue at 13:42, and never warned me the far side was silent.
The Five-Meeting Issue
I learned this the hard way. Convo’s real-time coaching doesn’t work until the app has processed five meetings. The message is in the app, plainly worded, and it’s the first thing you hit after paying.
Normally I try and test these things on the lowest tier possible, but to access that headline feature of Live Assistant I needed to pay for Professional.
So, if you subscribe on a Monday to see whether real-time coaching is worth having, you probably won’t find out on Monday. You find out once you’ve run five calls through it, and most reps don’t run five calls worth recording in their first week of testing a new tool. Equally, there was no free trial to test this with.
There’s a fair reading here. A coach that doesn’t know your product or your objections gives you generic advice. Five meetings is the price of context.
So I fed it five. Mine, and public sales training videos off YouTube, because I didn’t have five live sales calls sitting in the queue that week. This was intentional as some of the YouTube training roleplays were, quite frankly, not the best. With a few years of intense sales training in my past, I was able to identify a few issues on them and I was keen to see if Convo picked up on them.
It also surfaced something I wasn’t testing for. Convo takes five meetings to learn your company and your product, and it accepted a mixed set of my own calls and somebody else’s training footage without a flag, a prompt, or a question about whether those five had anything to do with each other.
Does the Real-Time Coaching Actually Work?
Yes. Too late in my opinion, but yes.
The quality of the suggestions genuinely surprised me. The AI produced three branched follow-ups for a single moment in the call, which Convo calls the LARC framework, each keyed to a different way the prospect might answer: if they push back on price, say this; if they ask about timeline, say this; if they go quiet, say this. Not template filler. Specific to the deal on the table, using details from the conversation I’d just had.
Then I looked at the clock.
The answers landing on my screen belonged to a question the prospect had asked several minutes earlier. The moment had opened, played out and closed, and I’d already improvised something probably worse than what Convo eventually suggested.
The thing is, if I were a green salesperson, this would stump me a bit.
I sold for a living before I wrote for one. Three hundred dials a day, five demos on a heavy one. What you learn fast is that the gap between the objection and your answer is the answer. On a discovery call with room to breathe, four minutes of lag is survivable. On a cold call, where the run from objection to close is ninety seconds, the coaching arrives after you’ve hung up. Real conditions are faster than my testing, not slower.
The cue cards have a separate problem. It handed me Convo’s own local-processing pitch as though it were my product’s selling point. It was a little confusing trying to tell my willing participant that the software I was selling had a feature that had nothing to do with what I was talking about.
One caveat I only found later: Convo wasn’t capturing the far side of my calls at all, which may be part of why the suggestions ran behind. More on that below.
Where the Feedback Falls Down
I ran a full fake cold call with Matt, mostly to test the tool and kind of just to show off. I reckon he’d have given me his credit card if I’d actually had something to sell. Every old trick from my years on the phones.
Convo’s conversation analysis came back showing one single speaker.
Talking To Myself
Matt wasn’t merged into my speaker label or misattributed to me. He wasn’t there at all. You can see the shape of his answers in the gaps between my own lines: I ask what happens to the people who land on your site and don’t convert, and 15 seconds later I’m saying, “and that’s quite a high percentage of your traffic.” He replied. I heard him. There’s no record of it.
The answer was in my own settings. Convo didn’t have macOS screen and system audio permission, which is what a bot-free tool needs to hear the far side of a call. It never had a chance of capturing Matt.
I’d have granted it had I been prompted. One-tap toggle, and I turn these on for every tool I test. It never asked, and nothing in the app suggested anything was missing. Twenty-odd minutes of me chatting away to a call it could only half hear, having asked “are you OK for me to record this?” when it wasn’t recording either side properly. No warning, no error state, nothing saying the far side had been silent since the first minute. Talk-time coaching generated from a conversation it heard half of.
Transcription Failures
Then there’s the transcription itself. My own first name, in the opening line of the call, came back as “Staniel.” The company I was pretending to sell for, let’s call them Trace Analytics, became “Trays Analytic” and stayed that way for 21 minutes. A price of 150 a month became “150,000 month,” which is the sort of error a sales team would notice in a call record.
What Convo Gets Right: The Post-Call Feedback
The post-call feedback is probably the best thing in the product. It was pretty good for something that lacked context of a specific sales pitch.
It quotes you back to yourself with timestamps. Each line gets sorted into what worked and what didn’t, and every one comes with a “try saying” rewrite underneath. Any rewrite can be saved as a live cue for the next call, the one place where the real-time layer and the review layer talk to each other. Talk-time analysis sits alongside it.
But the coaching read generic to me, and there’s a structural reason for it rather than a maturity one. Convo’s data is walled off at the company boundary, so the only material personalizing your feedback is your own meetings plus whatever the model already knew about selling. I tested solo, which is the thinnest possible version of that: one person, five meetings, no colleagues to learn from.
Two smaller things. Feedback takes minutes to generate, so it isn’t ready when the call ends, and there’s no copy button on the pane, when notes and transcript both have one.
We’ve done a lot on transcription accuracy in other languages lately, such as German and Japanese, so transcription errors are nothing new, but in English, that clearly spoken it was pretty surprising.
All of that on microphone audio with no compression, no packet loss, and no crosstalk. It was probably the cleanest input this tool will ever get.
Also, and this was more of a happy accident than a true test, but I had Convo running while I was doing the more recent Russian Transcription Accuracy testing. Number 1, major red flag that I didn’t know it was recording at the time; number 2, it tried to transcribe it in Portuguese. Convo doesn’t support Russian; it doesn’t claim to, nor would I have tested it on it, but the concern is that it tried to “guess” what was being said, leading to some severe hallucinations about wood.
What Convo Can See, and What It Keeps
Convo’s onboarding tells you what it does, in its own words: it listens to your call, reads your screen, and cross-checks facts online. Credit where it’s due. Most vendors in this category would bury that in a sub-clause of a privacy policy.
The problem is that a plain statement arrives with no controls attached.
Convo’s onboarding says it reads your screen. What it doesn’t say is what “your screen” covers. I couldn’t find a setting that limits it to the meeting window, and I couldn’t tell from the interface whether it was capturing the call window or the whole display. Their privacy and security pages talk about audio, encryption, and local processing, and don’t mention screen capture.. There’s no setting limiting what it sees. Their privacy and security pages talk about audio, encryption, and local processing, and don’t mention screen capture at all.
The permission finding cuts both ways here. The app told me at onboarding that it reads my screen, then ran for about a week without the permission that would let it. Same silence as the missing audio channel.
Then there’s what it keeps. Their sales page sells real-time coaching with no bots or recordings. My account lists every call tagged REC, and the audio plays back.
Balance where it’s earned: the overlay is genuinely screenshot-proof, which is why every image in this review is a phone photo. And there’s a hide-on-share toggle that lets you make it visible to the other side. That’s a vendor shipping a way to be transparent. Nobody else in the category has needed one.
Six languages, per their FAQ: English, Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, Italian.
Convo Pricing
Convo runs $29.99 a month for Starter and $69.99 for Professional, dropping to $22.49 and $52.49 on annual billing. Enterprise is custom.
Check the number against the page you’re on, though. Their own site carries three different entry prices in different places, including a $14.99 that doesn’t reconcile with anything currently sold.
Live Assistant is Professional only. The MCP server sits on Starter, the cheaper tier, which is pretty cool.
On CRM, I couldn’t work out how to connect anything other than Attio, and their own pages point everything beyond calendar, Slack, and email at Zapier. For a product sold on syncing notes to your CRM, that’s a gap between the pitch and the setup screen.`
Convo Alternatives
The useful split here isn’t good versus bad. It’s when the help arrives.
Live, during the call: Clari Copilot, Outreach’s Kaia, and Balto.
After the call: Gong is the category default, and what you’re paying for is the aggregate across your team and thousands of others. Chorus does the same inside ZoomInfo. Otter and Fireflies are transcription-first and cheap. tl;dv sits between them, recording and coaching with searchable history.
tl;dv vs Convo
Both tools record and keep your calls, so the difference isn’t retention. It’s who the coaching is built for.
Convo coaches the rep. It reads your call, tells you what you said, and offers what you could have said instead. tl;dv coaches the rep and the team. You define a playbook per deal stage, the AI checks calls against it, and a manager sees who’s running the process and who isn’t.
| Convo | tl;dv | |
|---|---|---|
| During the call | Live suggestions on screen, Professional tier | Not offered |
| After the call | Your lines quoted back with rewrites | Calls scored against playbooks you define |
| Who sees it | You | You and your manager |
| New rep onboarding | Nothing built for it | Clip libraries of calls that went well |
| Speaker separation | By capture channel, not by voice | By speaker |
| Languages | 6 | 30+ |
| Entry price | $29.99/mo, $69.99 for live coaching | Free tier available |
Convo wins the live nudge outright. Nothing tl;dv offers does it, and if you freeze on objections that’s a real win, though in my testing the prompts weren’t particularly live or particularly useful.
Whether you want it at all is down to how you sell. Live prompting feels to me like a manager at my shoulder in the moment I most need to be present with the person on the other end, and I’d take the retrospective every time: a month of calls read together with the pattern pulled out, rather than feedback one call at a time. I know reps who’d say the opposite.
Convo Review 2026: The Verdict
Based on my limited testing, I think Convo is not bad. If I were a solo sales contractor, or just needed a bit of reassurance live on the call, I could see how it would slot in well. For $69.99 a month, you get effectively a coach that will listen to your calls, give you tips, and, after a while, learn about your offering and service.
The post-call feedback was good; the rewrites are specific and grounded in pretty solid sales coaching. It’s also a lot cheaper than Gong and the others in that particular field.
But, if I had $70 to spend, I’d want more than just a tool designed to help me sell, or manage Customer Success calls. I’d want a tool that I could take across different types meetings that would give me better access to my recordings (for the record, Convo saves it in the dash as an audio file. No video, no clipping, nothing to take it out of the dash.)
If you want real-life, targeted, ongoing learning rather than a snippet of hot take after the fact, then tl;dv offers that and a whole lot more. Playbooks per deal stage. Playbooks per deal stage, calls scored against them, patterns pulled from your whole call history instead of one conversation at a time. Try tl;dv free and score your next call against a playbook you define.
FAQs about Convo
Do you need to run five meetings before Convo works?
For the live coaching, yes, and you need to be on Professional too. Live Assistant is $69.99 a month, and even then it stays switched off until Convo has processed five meetings so it can learn your company and product. Transcription and post-call feedback work from day one.
How much does Convo cost?
$29.99 a month for Starter and $69.99 for Professional, the tier that carries the live coaching, dropping to $22.49 and $52.49 on annual billing. Enterprise is custom. Their developer documentation lists $14.99 and $37.99 instead, so check the number against the page you’re buying from.
Does Convo record your calls?
Yes, despite marketing that sells real-time coaching with no bots or recordings. My account listed every call tagged REC and played the audio back. There’s no bot in the participant list, which is the part of the claim that holds up.
Can Convo see your screen?
Convo’s onboarding says it reads your screen and cross-checks facts online. Screen access isn’t scoped to the meeting window, so anything else open is in scope, and there’s no setting limiting what it sees. Their privacy pages don’t mention screen capture.
What's the difference between Convo and tl;dv?
Convo coaches the individual rep, live during the call and with line-by-line feedback afterward. tl;dv coaches the team, scoring calls against playbooks a manager defines and reading objection patterns across your full history. Disclosure: tl;dv is a client.
